M/S San Finance Corporation, Nagpur v. Income Tax Officer, Nagpur &Others
High Court
17 Jun 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
M/S San Finance Corporation, Nagpur v. Income Tax Officer, Nagpur &Others
Date of order
17 Jun 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In M/S San Finance Corporation, Nagpur v. Income Tax Officer, Nagpur &Others, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1645/2014
(M/S SAN FINANCE CORPORATION, NAGPUR VERSUS INCOME TAX OFFICER, NAGPUR &OTHERS)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri N.S. Bhattad, counsel for the petitioner.Shri Anand Parchure, counsel for the R-1.Shri Y. Maheshwari h/f Shri S.V. Bhutada, counsel for the R-3.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIKANDPRASANNA B. VARALE,JJ.
DATE:JUNE 17
, 2015.
Shri Bhattad, the learned counsel for the petitioner,states that the appeal filed by the respondent no.3 is allowed and,hence, there may not be any demand against the petitioner.
In view of the subsequent development, the learnedcounsel seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
APTE
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.