M/S Sansui Electronics v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
M/S Sansui Electronics v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Sansui Electronics v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.As such, making the directions in M/s Stovekraft India (supra) applicable mutatis mutandis, also to the present appeal, the same is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA No. 52 of 2018 Decided on: July 12, 2018
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M/S Sansui Electronics
....appellant
Versus
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax
….Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting? No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the appellant : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan Singh, Advocate.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral):
Undisputedly, issues involved in the present appeal already stand adjudicated by this Court in ITA No. 20 of 2015, titled as M/s Stovekrat India v. Commissioner of Income Tax, decided on 28.11.2017.
2.As such, making the directions in M/s Stovekraft India (supra)
applicable mutatis mutandis, also to the present appeal, the same is disposed of.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of
accordingly.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice (Sandeep Sharma) Judge
July 12, 2018 (vikrant/reena)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? .
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue