Case LawHigh Court › M/S. Saptashrungi Switchgears, Nashik v....

M/S. Saptashrungi Switchgears, Nashik v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors

High Court 15 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
M/S. Saptashrungi Switchgears, Nashik v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
15 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M/S. Saptashrungi Switchgears, Nashik v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Amk 1 (931) WP 2102/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYAPPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2102 OF 2011 M/s. Saptashrungi Switchgears, Nashik.. Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors... Respondents Mr. S. N. Inamdar and Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the Petitioner.Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Respondents. P.C. 1.Rule returnable forthwith. By consent, the Petition is taken up for final hearing. 2.By this Petition, the Petitioner seeks stay of demands raised for the assessment year 2008-09 pursuant to the assessment order dated 20[th] November, 2010 as rectified by order dated 04.02.2011 under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Admittedly the Petitioner has filed an Appeal against the assessment order and has also filed a stay application before CIT on 8[th] March, 2011. In the said stay application the Petitioner has specifically pleaded that under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act deemed dividend can be computed to the extent of accumulated profit of the lending company, however, in the present case the Assessing Officer has computed the deemed dividend on gross total income. Admittedly, the stay application filed by the Petitioner 2 (931) WP 2102/11 is pending before the CIT. Even before the disposal of the stay application, the Assessing Officer has attached the bank accounts of the Petitioner by his letters dated 8[th] February, 2011, 15[th] February, 2011 & 15[th] February, 2011 being Exhibit H-1 to H-3. Hence the attachment of the bank accounts are set aside and the CIT is directed to dispose of the stay application dated 8[th] March, 2011 in accordance with law. (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan