M/S. Sarat Tea Company Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Raiganj, Ward – 2(4) & Ors
High Court
05 Sep 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
M/S. Sarat Tea Company Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Raiganj, Ward – 2(4) & Ors
Date of order
05 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Sarat Tea Company Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Raiganj, Ward – 2(4) & Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
05.09.2023PBSl. No.6.
WPA 19241 of 2023
M/s. Sarat Tea Company Pvt. Ltd.
VsIncome Tax Officer, Raiganj,Ward – 2(4) & Ors.
Mr. Avra Mazumder,Mr. Samrat Das. … For the Petitioner.Mr. Om Narayan Rai.……..for the respondent.
Instruction filed by Mr. Rai be kept with therecord.
This writ petition has been filed against thegrievance of non-refund of interest in question relatingto the assessment years 2017-18, 2020-21 and 2022-23. Pursuant to the direction of this Court dated 29[th]August, 2023, Mr. Rai, learned advocate appearing forthe respondents has submitted instruction issued on4[th] September, 2023 by ITO, Ward-2(4), Raiganj andon perusal of the said instruction, I find that there is arecording in the said instruction that the refundableamount in question will be credited in the petitioner’saccount and considering such submission and takinginto consideration the aforesaid instruction, this writpetition being WPA 19241 of 2023 is disposed of bydirecting the respondent authorities concerned to
credit the refundable amount in question in thepetitioner’s account within four weeks from the date ofcommunication of this order after observing all legalformalities.
( Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.