M/S Sardar Singh & Party v. Asstt. Commissioner Of
High Court
08 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
M/S Sardar Singh & Party v. Asstt. Commissioner Of
Date of order
08 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Sardar Singh & Party v. Asstt. Commissioner Of, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
J U D G M E N T
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6627/2006
(M/s Sardar Singh & Party Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of
Income Tax & Ors.)
Date of Judgment: 08.08.2007
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Mr. Yogesh Sharma, for the petitioner.
Mr. K.K. Bissa, for the respondents.
This writ petition is directed againstimpugned notice dated 28.6.2006 (Annexure-5) issued byAssistant Commissioner, Income-tax, Central-I, Udaipurunder Section 158 BD read with Section 158 BC of theIncome Tax Act, 1961.
It is contended by learned counsel for thepetitioner that in pursuance of the impugned notice,the petitioner has already filed his objections by wayof reply, which is placed on record as Annexure-6.However, the objections submitted by the petitionerhas not been considered by the respondents till today.
In the interest of justice, the Asstt.
Commissioner, Income Tax, Central-I, Udaipur isdirected to decide the objections raised in replyfiled by the petitioner along with the additional
arun
grounds, if any raised by the petitioner, inaccordance with the law, expeditiously by speakingorder.
With the above direction, the petition isdisposed of.
(GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.