Case LawHigh Court › M/S Sarup Tanneries Limited Jalandhar v....

M/S Sarup Tanneries Limited Jalandhar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jalandhar

High Court 16 Jan 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Sarup Tanneries Limited Jalandhar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jalandhar
Date of order
16 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S Sarup Tanneries Limited Jalandhar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jalandhar, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Income Tax Appeal No.868 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. Income Tax Appeal No.868 of 2010Date of Decision: 16.1.2015 M/s Sarup Tanneries Limited Jalandhar ..Appellant versus The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Jalandhar ..Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S.WALIA Present:Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate,for the respondent. RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the appellant/assessee states that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal without prejudice to his right in ITANo.472 of 2009. Counsel for the revenue states that he has no objection. In view of statements made by counsel for the parties, theappeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. ( RAJIVE BHALLA ) JUDGE 16.1.2015VK ( B.S.WALIA )JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan