In M/S Seetal Khurana Foods v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(1), Bathinda And Another, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB ANDHARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.16747 of 2009
Date of Order: 4.11.2009
M/s Seetal Khurana Foods
...Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(1), Bathinda and another
....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
Present:Mr. Binderjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
1.To be referred to the Reporter or not?2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
M.M. KUMAR,J
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal ofthe petition with liberty to raise all the issues before the AssessingAuthority.
Ordered accordingly.
( M.M. KUMAR )JUDGE
November 04, 2009manoj
( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue