M/S. Shaney Kirkwood Private v. The Additional Commissioner Of
High Court
16 Dec 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S. Shaney Kirkwood Private v. The Additional Commissioner Of
Date of order
16 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Shaney Kirkwood Private v. The Additional Commissioner Of, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Since the appeals are already allowed, we direct the revenue to return the bank guarantee as also the deposit amount with accrued interest if any within four weeks from today.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3449 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1509 OF 2007
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3451 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1496 OF 2007
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3452 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1501 OF 2007
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3453 OF 2011
IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1515 OF 2007
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3454 OF 2011
IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1516 OF 2007
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3455 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1517 OF 2007
M/s. Shaney Kirkwood Private.
..Appellant.
Vs.
The Additional Commissioner of
Income Tax, 10(2)...Respondent.
....
Mr. V. Murlidhar a/w. B.G. Yewale, i/b. Rajesh Shah & Co. for the Appellant.
Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondent.
....
CORAM : J. P. DEVADHAR &
A.R. JOSHI, JJ. th DECEMBER, 2011.
DATED : 16
P.C.
1.Admittedly, all these appeals have been allowed by this Court on 29th July, 2011. However, while disposing of the appeals no orders were passed on the deposits and the bank guarantee furnished by the appellants pursuant to the orders passed at the time of the admission of the appeal. Since the appeals are already allowed, we direct the revenue to return the bank guarantee as also the deposit amount with accrued interest if any within four weeks from today.
2.Notice of Motions are disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(A. R. JOSHI, J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue