Case LawHigh Court › M/S Shiv Vegpro Private Limited v. The D...

M/S Shiv Vegpro Private Limited v. The Deputy / Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cir-Cle

High Court 25 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
M/S Shiv Vegpro Private Limited v. The Deputy / Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cir-Cle
Date of order
25 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Shiv Vegpro Private Limited v. The Deputy / Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cir-Cle, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Impugned order(s)stands quashed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15350/2022 M/s Shiv Vegpro Private Limited, Through Its Director ShriSandeep Kumar Saboo S/o Late Shri Sudarshan Saboo Aged 37Years, 343-A, Saboo Sadan, Talwandi, Kota. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Deputy / Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cir-cle -2, Central Revenue Building, Rawat Bhata Road,Kota.cle -2, Central Revenue Building, Rawat Bhata Road,Kota. 2. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, North Block, Secretariat,Building, New Delhi - 110001.Building, New Delhi - 110001. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Gargieya with Mr. Devang Gargieya Mr. Devang Gargieya For Respondent(s): Mr. Anurag Mathur on behalf of Mr. Shantanu Sharma HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 25/11/2024 1.Heard. 2.Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that issueraised in this petition is no longer res integra and standsconcluded vide order dated 21.03.2024 passed by Division Benchof this Court in the case of Tirupati Construction Company Vs. Income Tax Officer [(2024) 465 ITR 611 (Raj)]. 3.We have gone through the relief sought in this petition, thefactual background as also the issue involved. 4.Taking into consideration that the challenge to the order isbased mainly on the ground that present is a case pertains to proceedings of re-assessment on the basis of search carried outprior to 01.04.2021, the issue raised in this petition standscovered by the aforesaid order passed in the case of TirupatiConstruction Company (supra). 5.Accordingly, the petition is also allowed. Impugned order(s)stands quashed. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ RAJAT/MR/178
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan