Case Law › High Court › M/S Shree Ram Mills Ltd v. A.a. Sayed, J

M/S Shree Ram Mills Ltd v. A.a. Sayed, J

High Court 08 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

08 Jul 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Shree Ram Mills Ltd v. A.a. Sayed, J, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 4044 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-7Vs. M/s Shree Ram Mills Ltd. ...Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr. K. Shivram with Rahul Hatani i/by Ajay R. Singh for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 8TH JULY, 2011. P.C. 1This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order of ITAT dated 10th September, 2009, whereby the ITAT has set aside the order of CIT(A) and restored the matter to the file of Assessing Officer with direction to decide the matter afresh by applying the principles laid down by the Special Bench in the case of Atmaram Properties Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Jt. CIT, reported in 102 TTJ 345. Since the Tribunal has remanded back the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision, we do not want to entertain this appeal, especially when there is no challenge to the aforesaid Special Bench decision of the Tribunal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) ( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.