Case LawHigh Court › M/S. Silk & Art Silk Mfrs. Association L...

M/S. Silk & Art Silk Mfrs. Association Ltd. Bombay v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Pune

High Court 29 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S. Silk & Art Silk Mfrs. Association Ltd. Bombay v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Pune
Date of order
29 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M/S. Silk & Art Silk Mfrs. Association Ltd. Bombay v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Pune, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.206 of 1993 M/s. Silk & Art Silk Mfrs.Association Ltd. Bombay: Appellant v/sThe Commissioner of Income TaxPune: Respondent Mr. S.J. Mehta advocate for appellantNone for respondent Coram : Dr.S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date: 29.7.2008. In view thereof rule is discharged. The reference is returned back unanswered. (S.J. Kathawalla,J.) (Dr.S. Radhakrishnan,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan