Case LawHigh Court › M/S Singhal Builder Contractor v. The As...

M/S Singhal Builder Contractor v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, Bharatpurraj

High Court 06 Mar 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
M/S Singhal Builder Contractor v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, Bharatpurraj
Date of order
06 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Singhal Builder Contractor v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, Bharatpurraj, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14403/2014 M/s Singhal Builder Contractor Through Its Partner Shri SatishKumar Singhal S/o Shri Kapoor Chand ----Petitioner Versus The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, BharatpurRaj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Tarak Ahuja forMr.Mahendra GargieyaMr.Mahendra GargieyaFor Respondent(s): Mr.Aditya Khandelwal forMr.Anuroop SinghiMr.Anuroop Singhi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA 06/03/2025 Order Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh under the AMESTYScheme. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending application(s) stand dismissed. (MANEESH SHARMA),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/13
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan