Case LawHigh Court › M/S. Sis Live v. Assistant Commissioner...

M/S. Sis Live v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 09 May 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
M/S. Sis Live v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Sis Live v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: The present appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 43. + ITA 148/2016 M/s. SIS LIVE ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing counsel with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 09.05.2016 CM No. 17388/2016 (for early hearing) 1. With the consent of the parties, the appeal itself is taken up for hearing today. 2. The application is disposed of. ITA No. 148/2016 3. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) is directed against the order dated 2[nd] December, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 1313/Del/2015 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2011-12. ITA No. 148 of 2016 Page 1 of 3 4. The issue concerning the Transfer Pricing adjustment was not adjudicated by the ITAT in the impugned order on the ground that no addition has been made in computing the total income of the Assessee. It is not in dispute that the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) had in fact set in motion rectification proceedings for the purposes of adjustment on account of the Transfer Pricing issue. Even before the ITAT gave the impugned order, on 26[th]November 2015 an order of rectification has been passed by the AO making the Transfer Pricing Adjustment for the purposes of computing of income. 5. The short prayer, therefore, is that the impugned order of the ITAT should be set aside and the matter should be remanded to the ITAT for deciding the issue of Transfer Pricing adjustment. 6. In view of the fact that the ITAT had declined to adjudicate the Transfer Pricing issue because no addition has been made by the AO and considering that the AO passed a rectification order on 26[th] November 2015 making an adjustment on the Transfer Pricing issue, the Court sets aside the impugned order of the ITAT dated 2[nd] December 2015 and remands the appeal being ITA No. 1313/Del/2015 to the ITAT for a fresh adjudication on the Transfer Pricing adjustment issue in accordance with law. 7. The appeal will now be listed before the ITAT on 1[st] June 2016. The ITAT is requested to dispose of the appeal within a period of three months thereafter. 8. The present appeal is disposed of in the above terms. ITA No. 148 of 2016 9. The date already fixed stands cancelled. Order dasti. S. MURALIDHAR, J MAY 09, 2016 dn VIBHU BAKHRU, J ITA No. 148 of 2016
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan