In M/S S.j. Exports & Anr v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: We, accordingly, set aside the order dated 11.3.2004 impugned in the present petition and direct the Commissioner of Income tax to reconsider the petitioner’s application dated 30.9.1997 seeking extension under section 80HHC(2)(a) in accordance with law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2004.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2004.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2004.
M/s S.J. Exports & anr. .. Petitioners.
vs.
Commissioner of Income-tax & ors.. Respondents.
Shri Jitendra Jain i/b R.M. G. Law Associates for the
petitioners.
Shri A.S. Rao for the respondents.
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 6-5-2005.
DATED: 6-5-2005.
DATED: 6-5-2005.
P.C.
1. Heard parties. Perused petition and annexures
thereto.
2. Having considered the available material and
all the aspects, we are of the view that the
application made by the petitioner seeking extension
under section 80HHC(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act for
realisation of outstanding export proceeds requires
reconsideration. It appears from the impugned order
that the delay in receiving the export proceeds is
only of two months. Although no specific reason for
the delay is given by the assessee, the fact that the
assessee had applied for extension and the fact that
the entire export proceeds have been received within a
period of 2 months cannot be ignored. The
Commissioner seems to have stretched the matter by
observing that the assessee ought to have established
with evidence that he was unable to bring the
convertible foreign exchange for the reasons beyond
control. The matter requires reconsideration by the
Commissioner of Income Tax.
3. We, accordingly, set aside the order dated
11.3.2004 impugned in the present petition and direct
the Commissioner of Income tax to reconsider the
petitioner’s application dated 30.9.1997 seeking
extension under section 80HHC(2)(a) in accordance with
law.
4. As regards the challenge to the notice under
section 148 of the Income tax Act, liberty to the
petitioner to apply to the concerned Assessing Officer
for appropriate order in the light of this order.
5. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms.
No order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.