Case LawHigh Court › M/S S.j. Exports & Anr v. Commissioner O...

M/S S.j. Exports & Anr v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors

High Court 06 May 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S S.j. Exports & Anr v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors
Date of order
06 May 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M/S S.j. Exports & Anr v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Decision: We, accordingly, set aside the order dated 11.3.2004 impugned in the present petition and direct the Commissioner of Income tax to reconsider the petitioner’s application dated 30.9.1997 seeking extension under section 80HHC(2)(a) in accordance with law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE. WRIT PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2004. WRIT PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2004. WRIT PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2004. M/s S.J. Exports & anr. .. Petitioners. vs. Commissioner of Income-tax & ors.. Respondents. Shri Jitendra Jain i/b R.M. G. Law Associates for the petitioners. Shri A.S. Rao for the respondents. CORAM: V.C.DAGA & CORAM: V.C.DAGA & CORAM: V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 6-5-2005. DATED: 6-5-2005. DATED: 6-5-2005. P.C. 1. Heard parties. Perused petition and annexures thereto. 2. Having considered the available material and all the aspects, we are of the view that the application made by the petitioner seeking extension under section 80HHC(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act for realisation of outstanding export proceeds requires reconsideration. It appears from the impugned order that the delay in receiving the export proceeds is only of two months. Although no specific reason for the delay is given by the assessee, the fact that the assessee had applied for extension and the fact that the entire export proceeds have been received within a period of 2 months cannot be ignored. The Commissioner seems to have stretched the matter by observing that the assessee ought to have established with evidence that he was unable to bring the convertible foreign exchange for the reasons beyond control. The matter requires reconsideration by the Commissioner of Income Tax. 3. We, accordingly, set aside the order dated 11.3.2004 impugned in the present petition and direct the Commissioner of Income tax to reconsider the petitioner’s application dated 30.9.1997 seeking extension under section 80HHC(2)(a) in accordance with law. 4. As regards the challenge to the notice under section 148 of the Income tax Act, liberty to the petitioner to apply to the concerned Assessing Officer for appropriate order in the light of this order. 5. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan