M/S. S.k. Roy, P.k. Roy & Brothers v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-50(2) & Ors
High Court
10 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
M/S. S.k. Roy, P.k. Roy & Brothers v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-50(2) & Ors
Date of order
10 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S. S.k. Roy, P.k. Roy & Brothers v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-50(2) & Ors, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
10.12.2020
ss
W.P.A. 4499 of 2020
(Through Video Conference)
,
, M/s. S.K. Roy, P.K. Roy & Brothers Vs.
The Income Tax Officer, Ward-50(2) & ors.
,,,
Mrs. Sudeshna Mazumder
… For the petitioner
Mr. S. N. Dutta
Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee
… For the respondent
Mr. Abhratosh Majumdar, Ld. A.A.G.Mr. Avra Mazumder
… For the State
This is an application under Article 226 of theConstitution of India wherein the writ petitioner isaggrieved by inaction on the part of the respondent no.2in disposing of the appeal and stay petition.
I have heard learned counsel for the appearingparties and perused the materials on record.
Accordingly, direction is given upon the respondentno.2 to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitionerand dispose of the stay petition and appeal expeditiouslypreferably within a period of two weeks from date.
With the above direction, this writ petition isdisposed of.
Since no affidavit-in-opposition is called for,allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not tohave been admitted.
All parties are to act on website copy of this order.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.