Case LawHigh Court › Ms. Smita v. Dated : 3[Rd] December, 201...

Ms. Smita v. Dated : 3[Rd] December, 2018

High Court 03 Dec 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ms. Smita v. Dated : 3[Rd] December, 2018
Date of order
03 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ms. Smita v. Dated : 3[Rd] December, 2018, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: 4.Accordingly, all eight appeals are dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1221 OF 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax-4Mumbai .. Petitioner v/s. M/s. Premshree Gems Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1252 OF 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax-4Mumbai .. Petitioner v/s. M/s. Money Care Securities & Financial Services Ltd. .. RespondentWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1256 OF 2013The Commissioner of Income Tax-4Mumbai .. Petitioner v/s. M/s. Premsudha Exports Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1234 OF 2014The Commissioner of Income Tax-4Mumbai .. Petitioner v/s. M/s. Parag Parikh Financial Advisory ServicesLtd. .. Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1383 OF 2014WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1389 OF 2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax-4Mumbai v/s. M/s. Padmakshi Financial Services Ltd. .. Petitioner .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1225 OF 2016 The Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-4Mumbai v/s. Nandkishore & Co. .. Petitioner .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1329 OF 2016 The Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-4Mumbai v/s. Praveenkumar B. Kothari .. Petitioner .. Respondent Ms. Smita V. Thakur I/b Suresh Kumar for the appellantMs. Laxmi Rungta I/b PDS Legal for the respondents in ITXA 1221/13Mr. J.R. Shah for the respondent in ITXA 1329/16Ms. Rutuja Pawara I/b S.C. Tiwari for respondent in ITXA 1226/16 CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J. P.C. DATED : 3[rd] DECEMBER, 2018. 1.These appeals challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 2.Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing in support of the appeals invites our attention to the Circular No.3/2008 dated 11[th] July,2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes which inter aliadirects the Revenue not to press the pending appeals where the taxeffect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. 3.In view of the above Circular, Mr. Suresh Kumar has beeninstructed not to press the appeals as the tax effect involved in thepresent appeals is less than the threshold limits of Rs.50 lakhs. 4.Accordingly, all eight appeals are dismissed as not pressed. 5.Refund of Court Fees as per Rules. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan