Case Law › High Court › M/S Sodder Builders & Developers Pvt.ltd...

M/S Sodder Builders & Developers Pvt.ltd v. The Director General Of Income Tax(Central) Banga

High Court 02 Sep 2005 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

02 Sep 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Sodder Builders & Developers Pvt.ltd v. The Director General Of Income Tax(Central) Banga, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is allowed to bewithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 446 OF 2004 M/S SODDER BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD., Versus ....Petitioners THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) BANGA- ....Respondents Shri V. P. Thali, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the respondents. P.C. -Coram:R. M. LODHA, J.-Date:2nd September, 2005 Mr. V. P. Thali, the learned Counsel for the petitioner prays forwithdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to aggitate the grievance raised in the writ petition in the appeal already filed beforethe Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. All contentions raised by thepetitioner are, accordingly, kept open to be aggitated before theIncome-tax Appellate Tribunal. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is allowed to bewithdrawn. R. M. LODHA, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.