M/S. Supreme Products v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cir 2(2), Pune
High Court
03 Nov 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S. Supreme Products v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cir 2(2), Pune
Date of order
03 Nov 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Supreme Products v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cir 2(2), Pune, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: In view thereof, appeal is disposed of on withdrawal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byBalajiBalaji G.PanchalG.Date:Panchal2020.11.0411:48:26+0530
(5)-ITXA-305-04.doc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.305 OF 2004
M/s. Supreme Products Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax,Cir 2(2), Pune
..Appellant
..Respondent
Ms. Farzeen Khambatta, Advocate for the Appellant.Mr. Sham Walve, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 3[rd] NOVEMBER, 2020
P.C.
1. Heard Ms. Farzeen Khambatta, learned counsel for theappellant and Mr. Sham Walve, learned standing counsel for the revenue.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant hasfiled declaration under the Direct Tax Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 andtherefore would like to withdraw the appeal.
3. In view thereof, appeal is disposed of on withdrawal.
4. Refund as per rules.
5.This order will be digitally signed by the Personal Assistant ofthis Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of adigitally signed copy of this order.
ABHAY AHUJA, J
UJJAL BHUYAN, J
BGP.
1 of 1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.