Case Law › High Court › M/S Surekha Traders v. Commissioner Of I...

M/S Surekha Traders v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 10 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Sep 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In M/S Surekha Traders v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Income Tax Reference No. 387 of 1997 M/s Surekha Traders ..Applicant vs. Commissioner of Income Tax ..Respondent Ms.Asifa Khan i/b Mr.S.M.Lara for applicant. None for respondent. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 10th September,2008 CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 10th September,2008 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant. 2. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that there are no instructions from the applicant and in view thereof the learned Counsel is finding it difficult to proceed with the above matter. In view thereof the above reference is returned back unanswered. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.