In M/S. T Two International Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: P.C.: The short question raised in this Appeal is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the transfer of raw-material at cost price by the Appellant Company to its parent company amounts to 'sale' of goods and include the sale price in the total turnover for computing deduction U/s.
Decision: Accordingly, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
SSM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 920 OF 2010
M/s. T Two International Private Limited.... Appellant
VERSUS
Commissioner of Income Tax-8.... Respondent
Mr. B. U. Jhaveri a/w Ms. Preeti Shukla for Appellant.Ms. Padma Divakar for Respondent.
CORAM:J. P. DEVDHAR and R. M. SAVANT, J.J.
DATED:DECEMBER 13, 2010.
P.C.:
The short question raised in this Appeal is whether the
Tribunal was justified in holding that the transfer of raw-material at
cost price by the Appellant Company to its parent company amounts
to 'sale' of goods and include the sale price in the total turnover for
computing deduction U/s. 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal followed its decision in the case of the assessee for earlier
SSM
2itxa.920.10
year reported in (2008) 26 SOT 583 (MUM) and held that the transaction constitutes sale. The said decision has been accepted by
the appellant. In our opinion, the decision of the Tribunal to treat transfer of goods at cost constitutes sale cannot be faulted because it is not mandatory that in every sale there must be an element of profit. Accordingly, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed.
(R. M. SAVANT, J)
(J. P. DEVDHAR, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.