Case LawHigh Court › M/S. T Two International Private Limited...

M/S. T Two International Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-8

High Court 13 Dec 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S. T Two International Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-8
Date of order
13 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. T Two International Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: P.C.: The short question raised in this Appeal is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the transfer of raw-material at cost price by the Appellant Company to its parent company amounts to 'sale' of goods and include the sale price in the total turnover for computing deduction U/s.

Decision: Accordingly, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
SSM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 920 OF 2010 M/s. T Two International Private Limited.... Appellant VERSUS Commissioner of Income Tax-8.... Respondent Mr. B. U. Jhaveri a/w Ms. Preeti Shukla for Appellant.Ms. Padma Divakar for Respondent. CORAM:J. P. DEVDHAR and R. M. SAVANT, J.J. DATED:DECEMBER 13, 2010. P.C.: The short question raised in this Appeal is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the transfer of raw-material at cost price by the Appellant Company to its parent company amounts to 'sale' of goods and include the sale price in the total turnover for computing deduction U/s. 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal followed its decision in the case of the assessee for earlier SSM 2itxa.920.10 year reported in (2008) 26 SOT 583 (MUM) and held that the transaction constitutes sale. The said decision has been accepted by the appellant. In our opinion, the decision of the Tribunal to treat transfer of goods at cost constitutes sale cannot be faulted because it is not mandatory that in every sale there must be an element of profit. Accordingly, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed. (R. M. SAVANT, J) (J. P. DEVDHAR, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan