Case Law › High Court › M/S Texport Syndicate v. Asst.commission...

M/S Texport Syndicate v. Asst.commissioner Of Incometax 14 (2) Mumbai & Anr

High Court 14 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

14 Jul 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Texport Syndicate v. Asst.commissioner Of Incometax 14 (2) Mumbai & Anr, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal stands allowed. { A.V.Nirgude, J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan,J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan,J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan,J }

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.767 OF 2007 M/s Texport Syndicate .. Appellant Vs. Asst.Commissioner of IncomeTax 14 (2) Mumbai & anr ..Respondent Mr.S.J.Mehta for AppellantMr.P.S.Mahadevan for Respondent P.C. CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATED : 14th July, 2008 then pass an order afresh after examining the aforesaid issue. Appeal stands allowed. { A.V.Nirgude, J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan,J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan,J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan,J }

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.