M/S. Thazhayil Nidhi Ltd.6/4, Thazhayil Building,Elanthoor, Pathanamthitta v. Dated This The 25[Th] Day Of November, 2022
High Court
25 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
M/S. Thazhayil Nidhi Ltd.6/4, Thazhayil Building,Elanthoor, Pathanamthitta v. Dated This The 25[Th] Day Of November, 2022
Date of order
25 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Thazhayil Nidhi Ltd.6/4, Thazhayil Building,Elanthoor, Pathanamthitta v. Dated This The 25[Th] Day Of November, 2022, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 25 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 37837 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
M/S. THAZHAYIL NIDHI LTD.6/4, THAZHAYIL BUILDING,ELANTHOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA , REPRESENTED BY GENOY JOHN, MANAGING DIRECTOR, PIN - 689643BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNARESPONDENTS:1INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)ROOM NO. 308, 2ND, AAYAKAR BHAVAN,INCOME TAX OFFICE, BEACH ROAD,ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 6880012NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRENATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE,DELHI , REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS, PIN - 110001ADV. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM (SC)THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON25.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25[th] day of November, 2022
The petitioner suffered Ext.P1 order of
assessment for the assessment year 2019–2020 under theprovisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner hasfiled Ext.P2 appeal before the National Faceless AppealCentre. However, while filing the appeal, the petitioner didnot file any stay petition. He has, thereafter, sent Ext.P3application for stay by registered post. The learned counselfor the respondent department points out that thepetitioner ought to have filed the stay petition along withExt.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 cannot be considered by theNational Faceless Appeal Centre.
2.Having heard the learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for therespondent department, this writ petition is disposed ofdirecting the National Faceless Appeal Centre to provide alink to the petitioner for uploading the stay petition in
W.P. (C) No. 37837 of 2022
..3..
Ext.P2 appeal. Such link shall be provided within ten daysfrom today. On receipt of the link, the petitioner shall file astay petition within a period of two weeks from the date ofreceipt of the link. If such stay petition is filed in Ext.P2appeal, within the time specified above, further proceedingsfor recovery of amount due under Ext.P1 order ofassessment shall be kept in abeyance, till a decision istaken on the stay petition to be filed by the petitioner.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
RMV
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.JUDGE
..4..
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 37837/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2019-20 DTD. 31-08-2022Exhibit P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 29-09-2022 Exhibit P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 18-11-2022 Exhibit P4COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 16-11-2022
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A.TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.