Case LawHigh Court › M/S. Transchem Ltd v. Deputy Commissione...

M/S. Transchem Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 8(3) And Others

High Court 07 Jun 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S. Transchem Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 8(3) And Others
Date of order
07 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Transchem Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 8(3) And Others, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Decision: The Petition is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.942 OF 2010 M/s. Transchem Ltd...Petitioner.Vs.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 8(3)and others ..Respondents. ..... Mr. Pankaj R. Toprani for the Petitioner.Ms Suchitra Kamble i/b Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents...... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. P.C. : 7 June 2010. Objections have been filed by the assessee on 23 April 2010 to the reopening of the assessment by a notice dated 29 March 2010. The objections have not been considered by the Assessing Officer as yet and no order has been passed thereon. In these circumstances, we do not consider it appropriate to entertain the writ petition under Article 226 at this stage on merits. We direct the Assessing Officer to dispose of the objections of the assessee dated 23 April 2010 and to pass a reasoned order thereon. In the event that the objections are rejected, the Assessing Officer shall not pass an order of reassessment for a period of two weeks from the date of the communication of the order in order to enable the assessee to seek recourse to its remedies in law. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan