Case Law › High Court › M/S Transocean Offshore International Ve...

M/S Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd v. The Additional Director Of Income Tax

High Court 28 May 2013 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

28 May 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd v. The Additional Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal, accordingly, stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Income Tax Appeal No. 8 of 2013 M/s Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd. ………. Appellant Versus The Additional Director of Income Tax. ………. Respondent Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the respondent. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) The judgment, under appeal, is in consonance with the judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Halliburton Offshore Services Inc., reported in 300 ITR 265. Following the judgment, thus rendered by this Court in the afore-mentioned case, we answer the questions raised in this Appeal against the assessee. 2. The appeal, accordingly, stands disposed of. G (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 28.05.2013 (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 28.05.2013

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.