Case LawHigh Court › M/S Triple S Stock And Shares Pvt. Ttd v...

M/S Triple S Stock And Shares Pvt. Ttd v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 03 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
M/S Triple S Stock And Shares Pvt. Ttd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Triple S Stock And Shares Pvt. Ttd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: 7.The writ petition along with the pending application stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4835/2024 &CM APPL. 19733/2024 ((Interim Relief) M/S TRIPLE S STOCK AND SHARES PVT. TTD ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Pankhuri Shrivastava and Mr. Atreya G.C., Adv. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC along with Ms. Madhavi Shukla and Ms. Priya Sarkar, JSCs. % CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R 03.04.2024 CM APPL. 19734/2024(Ex.) 1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 4835/2024 & CM APPL. 19733/2024 ((Interim Relief) 3.Having heard learned counsels for parties, we note that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [‘ITAT’] was constrained to proceed ex parte and render its final decision on 08 February 2023 since the assessee had failed to respond inspite of notices having been issued since 06 November 2019. 4.The record would further bear out that earlier also the appeal before the ITAT had come to be dismissed for want of prosecution on before the ITAT had come to be dismissed for want of prosecution on 19 July 2018 which order was subsequently recalled and the appeal restored. The ITAT has further noted that none appeared for the appellant after 27 May 2022. 5.In view of the aforesaid, we find no ground to interfere with the order dated 22 September 2023 dismissing the miscellaneous application which had been moved. 6.However, and since the petitioner would otherwise have a remedy to assail the order of the ITAT rendered on merits that liberty shall stand reserved. 7.The writ petition along with the pending application stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms. YASHWANT VARMA, J. APRIL 03, 2024/RW PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan