Case LawHigh Court › M/S. T.v. Sundaram Iyengar And Sons Pvt...

M/S. T.v. Sundaram Iyengar And Sons Pvt Limited7B, Tvs Buildingwest Veli Street Madurai 625 001 v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Madurai

High Court 03 Jul 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S. T.v. Sundaram Iyengar And Sons Pvt Limited7B, Tvs Buildingwest Veli Street Madurai 625 001 v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Madurai
Date of order
03 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S. T.v. Sundaram Iyengar And Sons Pvt Limited7B, Tvs Buildingwest Veli Street Madurai 625 001 v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Madurai, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal under Section 263, Section 260A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.07.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE ANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN T.C.A.No.108 of 2025 M/s. T.V. Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Pvt Limited7B, TVS BuildingWest Veli Street Madurai 625 001...Appellant Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Madurai...Respondent Prayer : Appeal under Clause Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the order dated 28.10.2024 in ITA No.1803/CHNY/2019 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai A Bench. For Appellant :Mr.N.V.Balaji For Respondent :Mr.J.NarayanasamySenior Standing Counsel __________ Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The order dated 27.03.2019 passed by respondent under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has already been acted upon by the Assessing Officer and fresh assessment order has been passed. Shri. Balaji states an appeal is already pending against fresh assessment order before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 2. Moreover, in view of the factual findings given by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, we are not inclined to interfere. We clarify we have not made observation on the merits of the matter. 3. Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J.) 03.07.2025 Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nokpl __________Page 2 of 4 To 1. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Madurai. 2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A Bench. Chennai Chennai __________ Page 3 of 4 __________Page 4 of 4 T.C.A.No.108 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND SUNDER MOHAN,J. (kpl) T.C.A.No.108 of 2025 03.07.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan