In M/S. Universal Education Foundation v. Income Tax Ofïcer (Exemptions) 2(4, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.In view of the above, this appeal is disposed of asinfructuous. [ MILIND N.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1794 OF 2017
M/s. Universal Education Foundation
..Appellant
Versus
Income Tax OfÏcer (Exemptions) 2(4)..Respondent
...................
Mr. Rahul K. Hakani for the Appellant
Mr. Sham Walve for the Respondent
...................
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 21, 2020.
P.C.:
1.Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.Mr. Hakani, learned counsel for the appellant submits
that this appeal has become infructuous as the orderimpugned herein has been recalled in Misc. Application filedby the appellant before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
3.In view of the above, this appeal is disposed of asinfructuous.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
Digitally signedRavindraby Ravindra M.AmberkarM.Date:Amberkar2020.01.2217:35:52 +0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue