Case LawHigh Court › M/S Ups Invertor. Com… v. Principal Comm...

M/S Ups Invertor. Com… v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax …

High Court 23 Aug 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
M/S Ups Invertor. Com… v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax …
Date of order
23 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In M/S Ups Invertor. Com… v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax …, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1] __________________________________________________ For the Petitioner :Mr.

Decision: Consequently, the Review Petition is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

2024:HHC:7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMP(M) No. 1022 of 2024Date of decision: 23.08.2024 _____________________________________________________ M/s UPS Invertor. Com….. Petitioner Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax … Respondent _____________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice.The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1] __________________________________________________ For the Petitioner :Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent:Mr. Neeraj Sharma and Mr. IshaanKashyap, Advocates. M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (Oral) This application is filed to condone the delay of 5years 306 days in filing the Review Petition. 2.The only ground urged in the application forcondonation of delay is that the judgment relied upon in the ordersought to be reviewed was subsequently over-ruled by theSupreme Court. 3.It is settled law that change in law is not a ground forseeking review. Moreover, the appellant should have been morediligent in filing Review Petition with the time prescribed by law i.e. 30 days from the date of the order instead of filing the Review 1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Petition with such an abnormal period of delay without any properexplanation for its condonation. 4.Therefore, the application for condonation of delay isdismissed. Consequently, the Review Petition is also dismissed. (M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice. August 23, 2024 (hemlata) (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan