M/S Vardhman Acrylics Ltd. Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-I, Ludhiana And Another
High Court
18 Dec 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Vardhman Acrylics Ltd. Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-I, Ludhiana And Another
Date of order
18 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Vardhman Acrylics Ltd. Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-I, Ludhiana And Another, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
Income Tax Appeal No.633 of 2008Date of Decision: 18.12.2014
M/s Vardhman Acrylics Ltd. Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana.
..Appellant
versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-I, Ludhiana and another
.Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S.WALIA
Present:Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate,with Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate,for the appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate,for the respondents.
RAJIVE BHALLA, J.(ORAL)
For orders, see order of even date passed in Income
Tax Appeal No.146 of 2014 titled M/s Vardhman Acrylics Ltd.
”versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana and another.
( RAJIVE BHALLA ) JUDGE
18.12.2014VK
( B.S.WALIA )JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue