Case Law › High Court › M/S. Vardhman And Hiranandani Developers...

M/S. Vardhman And Hiranandani Developers v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 12 (3)(4) & Anr

High Court 20 Oct 2011 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Oct 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Vardhman And Hiranandani Developers v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 12 (3)(4) & Anr, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

k IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3107 OF 2011 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1287 OF 2011 M/s. Vardhman and Hiranandani Developers.. AppellantVs.Income Tax Officer, Ward 12 (3)(4) & Anr.... Respondent. Mr. Jitendra Singh for the appellant. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the respondents. CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 20TH OCTOBER, 2011. P.C. By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of. (K.K. TATED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.