M/S Velingkar Brothers, Mardol Goa v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Ors
High Court
02 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
M/S Velingkar Brothers, Mardol Goa v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Ors
Date of order
02 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In M/S Velingkar Brothers, Mardol Goa v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Ors, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 402 OF 2007
M/S VELINGKAR BROTHERS, MARDOL GOA.
VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND 2 ORS.,
... Applicant
... Respondents
Mr. R. G. Rivankar, Advocate for the Applicant.Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the Respondents.
P.C.:-
-Coram:R. S. MOHITE &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:2nd July, 2007
This Miscellaneous Civil Application for amendment was not foundon Board. The learned Counsel for the respondents states that since thesame is only for amendment there is no objection for amendment. Hence,the application for amendment is allowed. Amendment to be carried outwithin one week. Copy of the amended petition to be served within threeweeks.
S. O. - four weeks.
Matter to be placed for orders in case reply is not filed.
R. S. MOHITE, J.
RD.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.