Case Law › High Court › M/S Velingkar Brothers, Veling Mardol Go...

M/S Velingkar Brothers, Veling Mardol Goa v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax And 2 Ors

High Court 02 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

02 Jul 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In M/S Velingkar Brothers, Veling Mardol Goa v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax And 2 Ors, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 401 OF 2007 M/S VELINGKAR BROTHERS, VELING MARDOL GOA. VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND 2 ORS., ... Applicant ... Respondents Mr. R. G. Rivankar, Advocate for the Applicant.Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the Respondents. P.C.:- -Coram:R. S. MOHITE &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:2nd July, 2007 This Miscellaneous Civil Application for amendment was not foundon Board. The learned Counsel for the respondents states that since thesame is only for amendment there is no objection for amendment. Hence,the application for amendment is allowed. Amendment to be carried outwithin one week. Copy of the amended petition to be served within threeweeks. S. O. - four weeks. Matter to be placed for orders in case reply is not filed. R. S. MOHITE, J. RD. N. A. BRITTO, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.