Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates v. M/S Nkg Infrastructure Ltd
High Court
01 May 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates v. M/S Nkg Infrastructure Ltd
Date of order
01 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates v. M/S Nkg Infrastructure Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~51
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 514/2018 & CM APPL. 17462/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-3,
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary and
Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates.
versus
M/S NKG INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
..... Respondent
Through:
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 01.05.2018
The question of law urged by the Revenue in this case i.e. applicability of the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’), in the opinion of the Court, does not arise. What is immediately noticeable is that for the same assessment year (i.e. relatable to the financial year in which search proceedings took place) proceedings under Section 271-AAA of the Act too were initiated culminating in the levy of penalty, which is the subject matter of ITA No.517/2018. In these circumstances, there cannot be any levy under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act given the bar enacted by Section 271-AAA(3) of the Act. The question of law therefore does not arise.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
MAY 01, 2018
nn
A. K. CHAWLA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.