In M/S Vicco Products (Bombay) Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No.472 OF 2002.
INCOME TAX APPEAL No.472 OF 2002.
M/s Vicco Products (Bombay) Ltd. ..Appellant.
Vs.
Asstt. Commissioner of
Income-tax Mumbai. ..Respondent.
Mr P. C. Tripathi i/b Mrs N. Inamdar, Advocate for
the Appellant.
Mrs Anamika Malhotra, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND V.C. DAGA,JJ.
AND V.C. DAGA,JJ.
DATED:8th OCTOBER, 2008.
DATED:8th OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C.:-
P.C.:-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks
leave to withdraw the above appeal. The appeal is
allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
3. Proper court fee be refunded in the above
appeal as per rules.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue