M/S. Viral Filaments Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
15 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S. Viral Filaments Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
15 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S. Viral Filaments Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: (A), the ends of justice will be met if the impugned order is set aside and matter is restored back to the file of the I.T.A.T. for deciding the matter afresh.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 277 OF 2006
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 277 OF
M/s. Viral Filaments Ltd. ... Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Respondent
The Commissioner of Income Tax ...
The Commissioner of Income Tax ...
Mr. V.S. Hadade for the Appellant.
Mr. Sureshkumar for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: JANUARY 15, 2009
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 15, 2009
DATED: JANUARY 15, 2009
P.C.
P.C.
. The grievance of the appellant is that he has not
given notice of the hearing and in these
circumstances, the order of the I.T.A.T. proceeding
exparte and reversing the order of the C.I.T. (A)
should be set aside.
. We have perused the order of this court dated
11.12.2008. We find that the appellants were called
upon to file affidavit. That affidavit has not been
filed till date on account of some procedural
difficulties. However, considering what has been
argued at the bar, in our opinion, and more
specifically as the appellant had a judgment in his
favour before C.I.T. (A), the ends of justice will
be met if the impugned order is set aside and matter
is restored back to the file of the I.T.A.T. for
deciding the matter afresh. The appeal disposed of
accordingly.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.