Case LawHigh Court › M/S. Vodafone Idea Ltd v. Assistant Comm...

M/S. Vodafone Idea Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, & Ors

High Court 30 May 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
M/S. Vodafone Idea Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, & Ors
Date of order
30 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Vodafone Idea Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, & Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: The petition and application are disposed of in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 15 + W.P.(C) 6333/2019 & CM Appl. No. 26987/2019 (stay) M/S. VODAFONE IDEA LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Ms.Manasvini Bajpai, Advocate ..... Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, & ORS .... Respondents % CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE ASHA MENON O R D E R30.05.2019 1. The challenge in the petition is to the interim order dated 25[th] March 2019 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal („ITAT‟) in ITA No. 443/DEL/2016 for the Assessment Year 2011-12 (Erstwhile Vodafone West Ltd). 2. It is not in dispute that in relation to other sister entities of the Appellant, a Division Bench of this Court has already passed an order dated 29[th] April 2019 in W.P.(C) 4467/2019 (Vodafone Idea Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.) clarifying that the observations made by the ITAT in the impugned order should not be taken to be conclusive of its view on merits. Paragraph 5 of the said order reads as under: “5. This Court is of the opinion that till the remand directed by the ITAT is worked out and a report on that aspect is received, the ITAT's observations in the impugned order, particularly the ones quoted above, or any other observation like them which tend to indicate finality, shall in no way be treated as conclusive of the merits. All rights and contentions of the parties are accordingly kept open. The concerned Bench of the ITAT dealing with the final merits shall be uninfluenced by the said observations.” 3. Accordingly in the present case also the Court clarifies that the ITAT‟s observations in the impugned orders, which tend to indicate finality as regards its opinion on merits should not be treated as such and all rights and contentions of the parties are left open to be urged before the ITAT. It is clarified that ITAT while dealing with the merits, shall be uninfluenced by the impugned interim order. 4. The petition and application are disposed of in the above terms. S. MURALIDHAR, J. MAY 30, 2019 n ASHA MENON, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan