Case Law › High Court › M/S. Welcast Finstock Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai...

M/S. Welcast Finstock Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Saraf Chamber, Sadar, Nagpur And Another

High Court 07 Sep 2012 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

07 Sep 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In M/S. Welcast Finstock Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Saraf Chamber, Sadar, Nagpur And Another, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the facts disclosed in that civil application, writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Civil Application (CAW) No. 2346 of 2012 IN Writ Petition No. 772 of 2010 M/s. Jupiter Communication Pvt. Ltd., MumbaiVs. Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Saraf Chamber, Sadar, Nagpur and another WITH Civil Application (CAW) No. 2345 of 2012 INWrit Petition No. 758 of 2010 M/s. Welcast Finstock Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Saraf Chamber, Sadar, Nagpur and another WITH Civil Application (CAW) No. 2347 of 2012 IN Writ Petition No. 774 of 2010 Shri Chaitanya Kochar – HUF, Wardha Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Saraf Chamber, Sadar, Nagpur and another WITH Civil Application (CAW) No. 2344 of 2012IN Writ Petition No. 777 of 2010 M/s. Rashe Finstock Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Saraf Chamber, Sadar, Nagpur and another WITH Civil Application (CAW) No. 2343 of 2012INWrit Petition No. 778 of 2010 M/s. Butterfly Finstock Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Saraf Chamber, Sadar, Nagpur and another _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders of directionsCourt's or Judge's orders.and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri. Thakkar, Advocate for Petitioner Shri. Anand Parchure, Advocate for Respondents CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI& A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.DATED : SEPTEMBER 07, 2012. Shri. Thakkar, learned Counsel for petitioner, states that a separate application seeking withdrawal of writ petition is filed. We have perused that civil application. Punde Shri. Anand Parchure, learned Advocate for respondents, is not opposing the withdrawal. In view of the facts disclosed in that civil application, writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.