M/S Witmans Industries v. The Additional Commissioner Respondent Of Income Tax ,Range-10,Mumbai
High Court
01 Mar 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S Witmans Industries v. The Additional Commissioner Respondent Of Income Tax ,Range-10,Mumbai
Date of order
01 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Witmans Industries v. The Additional Commissioner Respondent Of Income Tax ,Range-10,Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONI.T.X.A.L. 1393/2010
M/s Witmans Industries AppellantVs.The Additional CommissionerRespondentof Income Tax ,Range-10,Mumbai
Mr.I.M.Bohra i/b Mr.B.R.Bhatia for the AppellantNone for respondent
P.C.
CORAM- J.P.DEVADHAR ,AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ.DATE -1[st] March,2011
.The questions raised in this appeal are covered against the assessee by the decision of the Apex Court in Liberty India Vs.Commissioner of Income Tax ,(2009) 317 ,I.T.R.218(S.C.) .
Hence the appeal is dismissed. No costs.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue