Case Law › High Court › M/S Zee Laboratories v. Principal Commis...

M/S Zee Laboratories v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax …

High Court 24 Apr 2021 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cmis

Parties

Date of order

24 Apr 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In M/S Zee Laboratories v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax …, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the appellant: Mr.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ITA No. 59 of 2017 Decided on: 24.04.2021 M/s Zee Laboratories .......Appellant Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax …...Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice.The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the appellant: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate.For the respondent: Mr.VinayKuthiala,Sr.Advocate with Mr. Diwan SinghNegi, Advocate. (Through video conferencing)L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties submit that thepresent matter is covered by the judgment of Hon’ble ApexCourt in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. AarhamSoftronics, 2019 412 ITR 623 SC. 2.In view of the above submissions, the present appealis disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( L. Narayana Swamy ) Chief Justice April 24, 2021 (naveen) ( Anoop Chitkara ) Judge 1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.