M/S.achleseh Org-Marg Pvt.ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-34, Mumbai-20
High Court
23 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.achleseh Org-Marg Pvt.ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-34, Mumbai-20
Date of order
23 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.achleseh Org-Marg Pvt.ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-34, Mumbai-20, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 144 OF 2003
M/s.Achleseh Org-Marg Pvt.Ltd.vs.
The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax,Special Range-34, Mumbai-20.
Appellant
Respondent
Mr.S.S.Shetty for the appellant.
Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Mr.V.H. Kantharia i/b.Mr.P.Kapur for the respondent.
P.C.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 23rd September 2004
Heard.
2. The issue raised in this appeal stands answered bythe Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case ofCommissioner of Income Tax v. Asian Cable CorporationLtd., 262 ITR 537. In view thereof, no substantialquestion of law arises in this appeal and it isdismissed accordingly.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue