M/S.afcons Infrastructure Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
16 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.afcons Infrastructure Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
16 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.afcons Infrastructure Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.44 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.44 OF 2006
M/s.Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. .. Appellant
V/s
Commissioner of Income Tax .. Respondent
Mr.Jitendra Jain i/by M/s.RMG Law & Associates for the
Appellant.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.
DATE : 16th June, 2008
DATE : 16th June, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Counsel for the parties agree that the issue
raised in this Appeal is squarely covered by an order
passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA
No.3059/Mum/2003 and ITA No.3060/Mum/2003 with regard to
the very same assessee for the Assessment Years 1998-99,
1999-2000 and 2000-2001. In view thereof, we pass the
following order:-
"The issue of disallowance of interest is set aside
and the Assessing Officer is directed to decide the
same afresh in accordance with law after giving the
assessee adequate opportunity of being heard. The
Assessing Officer shall apply the propositions laid
down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of SA
Builders Ltd.to the facts of this case."
(A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.