Case LawHigh Court › M/S.aircel Limited,Spencer Plaza 5[Th] F...

M/S.aircel Limited,Spencer Plaza 5[Th] Floor, 769, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002 v. The Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department, Ministry Of Finance, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, Ministry Of Fin

High Court 24 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S.aircel Limited,Spencer Plaza 5[Th] Floor, 769, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002 v. The Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department, Ministry Of Finance, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, Ministry Of Fin
Date of order
24 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.aircel Limited,Spencer Plaza 5[Th] Floor, 769, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002 v. The Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department, Ministry Of Finance, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, Ministry Of Fin, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 271 of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: 7.With the above observations & directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.No.12555 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.07.2025 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.12555 of 2024and W.M.P.Nos.13702 & 13703 of 2024 M/s.Aircel Limited,Spencer Plaza 5[th] Floor, 769, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.Represented by its Authorized Signatory K.P.Varadharajan ...Petitioner Vs. 1.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle-I (1), 6[th] Floor, Aayakar Bhavan-Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034. Company Circle-I (1), 6[th] Floor, Aayakar Bhavan-Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034. 2.The Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Assessment Unit, Room No.401, Second Floor, E Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, E Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, New Delhi - 110 003. ...Respondents 1/7 W.P.No.12555 of 2024 Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records comprised in the impugned order dated 30.03.2024 bearing reference DIN No: ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1063718199(1) bearing PAN: issued by the 2[nd] respondent and all proceedings pursuant thereto and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently forbear the respondents from proceeding with the impugned proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of the assessment year 2016-17. For Petitioner: Mr.Vishnu Mohan For Respondents : Mr.Avinash Krishnan Ravi Junior Standing Counsel Junior Standing Counsel O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to quash the impugned order dated 30.03.2024 passed by the 2nd respondent. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by virtue of the show cause notice dated 27.03.2024 for the financial year 2016-17, penalty proceedings were initiated and the said notice was uploaded in the GST portal on 27.03.2024 at 08.29p.m., calling upon the petitioner to furnish a reply along with supporting documentary evidence on 2/7 W.P.No.12555 of 2024 or before 06.09.p.m. on the next day i.e., 28.03.2024. He would submit that hardly 24 hours have been provided to the petitioner to furnish a reply and also for supportive documents. He would contend that no opportunity of personal hearing was provided by the 2[nd] respondent prior to the passing of the impugned order, which is violation of principles of natural justice. Hence, he prayed for appropriate directions. 3.On the other hand, the learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents would submit that penalty proceedings were initiated in consequence to the assessment order passed on 31.03.2022. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. On the other hand, the learned Junior Standing Counsel for the 4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents and also perused the materials available on record. 5.Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and upon perusal of the materials, in the present case, 3/7 W.P.No.12555 of 2024 3.On the other hand, the learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents would submit that penalty proceedings were initiated in consequence to the assessment order passed on 31.03.2022. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. On the other hand, the learned Junior Standing Counsel for the 4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents and also perused the materials available on record. 5.Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and upon perusal of the materials, in the present case, 3/7 W.P.No.12555 of 2024 while issuing the show cause notice on 27.03.2024 for levying penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, 24 hours only provided to the petitioner to furnish a reply along with supporting documentary evidence. Further, it appears that no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner prior to the passing of impugned order. Hence, this Court is of the view that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice, since it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to establish their case on merits. 6.In such view of the matter, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned order dated 30.03.2024 passed by the 2[nd] respondent. Accordingly, this Court passes the following order:- i)The impugned order passed by the 2ndrespondent dated 30.03.2024 is set aside. ii)Consequently, the matter is remanded to the 2nd respondent for fresh consideration. 4/7 iii) The petitioner is directed to file a reply along with supportive documents within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. iv) Thereupon, the 2[nd] respondent is directed to consider the reply and shall issue a clear 14 days notice affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and shall decide the matter in accordance with law. 7.With the above observations & directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 24.07.2025 Speaking order / Non-Speaking orderIndex: Yes / NoNeutral Citation: Yes / No sri 5/7 To 1.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle-I (1), 6[th] Floor, Aayakar Bhavan-Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034. 2.The Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Assessment Unit, Room No.401, Second Floor, E Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, New Delhi - 110 003. 6/7 7/7 W.P.No.12555 of 2024 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J., sri W.P.No.12555 of 2024andW.M.P.Nos.13702 & 13703 of 2024 24.07.2025 (1/2)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan