M/S.alfred C.toepfer (I) Export Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
25 Jan 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.alfred C.toepfer (I) Export Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
25 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In M/S.alfred C.toepfer (I) Export Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal therefore stands dismissed. ....
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.405 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.405 OF 2004
M/s.Alfred C.Toepfer (I) Export Ltd. .. Appellant
V/s
The Income Tax Officer
Ward No.3(4), Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr.F.I.Irani with Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Appellant.
Mr.R.V.Desai with Mr.R.Asokan for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused
the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated
31st October, 2003. The learned Counsel for the
Appellant fairly states that so far as issues raised
under Question Nos.1 to 5 in this Appeal are concerned,
they are squarely covered by the Division Bench judgment
in the case of C.I.T. V/s.Asian Cable Corporation
C.I.T. V/s.Asian Cable CorporationLimited - 262 ITR 537. So far as Question Nos.6 & 7 are
Limited - 262 ITR 537
concerned, the learned Counsel for the Appellant states
that he has instructions not to press the same. Under
these circumstances, nothing further survives in this
Appeal. Appeal therefore stands dismissed.
....
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.