M/S.a.m.m.arunachalam & Sons (P) Ltd v. The Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.12.2020 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH Tax Case (Appeal) No.320 of 2011 M/s.A.M.M.Arunachalam & Sons (P) Ltd. No.43, Moore Street, Chennai 600 001. Appellant Vs. The Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax, Circle IX, Chennai. Respondent Tax Case (Appeal) filed under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,'C' Bench, Chennai, dated 22.9.2010 made in ITA No.772/Mds/2009.Appeal agianst the order passed by the Commisioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-IX, Chennai 34, dated 18.2.2009 made in ITA.NO.76/08-09for the Assessment year 2006-07 against the order passed by theAssistant Commissiner of Income Tax, business circle IX, Chennai,dated 10.12.2008 made in PAN/GIRNo. for the Assessmentyear 2006-07 For Appellant : Mr.M.P.Senthilkumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Swaminathan Senior Standing Counsel assisted byMs.V.Pushpa, Jr. Standing CounselJUDGMENT(Delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J) The learned counsel Mr.M.P.Senthilkumar appearing for theAppellant/Assessee submitted that the Assessee has availed thebenefit under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 and therefore, hemay be permitted to withdraw the present Tax Case Appeal. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Mr.M.Swaminathan, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearingfor the Respondent/Revenue has no objection for the same. 3. Accordingly, the Tax Case Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.No costs. //True copy// -sd- Assistant Registrar Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai. 2. The Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax, Circle IX, Chennai. 3. The Commissioner of income tax (Appeals)-IXChennai 34. C.C. To MR.PHILIP GEROGE, Advocate SR.NO.42791C.C. To MR.M.SWAMINATHAN, Advocate SR.NO.42833 T.C.(A) No.320 of 2011KV(CO)RRI 21/01/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/