M/S.ar-Ex Laboratories Pvt.ltd v. Income Tax Officer Range 6(1)(3
High Court
22 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.ar-Ex Laboratories Pvt.ltd v. Income Tax Officer Range 6(1)(3
Date of order
22 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.ar-Ex Laboratories Pvt.ltd v. Income Tax Officer Range 6(1)(3, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.544 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.544 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.544 OF 2002
M/s.Ar-Ex Laboratories Pvt.Ltd. .. Appellant
Vs.
Income Tax Officer Range 6(1)(3) .. Respondent
Mr.K.B.Bhujale for the Appellant.
Mr.D.K.Kamlala for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 22nd July, 2008
DATE : 22nd July, 2008
DATE : 22nd July, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to
withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be
withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue