Case Law › High Court › M/S.babubhai Narottamdas & Co v. Appella...

M/S.babubhai Narottamdas & Co v. Appellant Respondents

High Court 19 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

19 Oct 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.babubhai Narottamdas & Co v. Appellant Respondents, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: In the present appeal also no substantial questionof law arises and it is dismissed accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 544 OF 2003 M/s.Babubhai Narottamdas & Co.vs.1. The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Ward 24(3)(4) & Anr.Mr.V.S.Hadade for the appellant. AppellantRespondents CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 19th October 2004P.C.The connected appeal being Income Tax Appeal No.517/2002 came up before us on 7th September 2004 andwe dismissed the same. 2. In the present appeal also no substantial questionof law arises and it is dismissed accordingly. (R.M.LODHA,J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.