M/S.bureau Veritas Indian Division v. Jt.commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
17 Jun 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.bureau Veritas Indian Division v. Jt.commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Jun 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S.bureau Veritas Indian Division v. Jt.commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1551 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.646 OF 2005
M/s.Bureau Veritas Indian Division .. Appellant
V/s
Jt.Commissioner of Income Tax .. Respondent
Ms.Asifa Khan for the Appellant.
Mr.A.S.Rao with Dr.P.Daniel for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.S.AGUIAR, JJ.
A.S.AGUIAR, JJ.
DATE : 17.06.2005.
DATE : 17.06.2005.
DATE : 17.06.2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this
Notice of Motion the Appellant is seeking condonation of
18 days delay in filing the Appeal. Perused the
affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion.
Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay.
There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of
bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission on
27.6.2005.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(A.S.AGUIAR,J.)
(A.S.AGUIAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue