Case LawHigh Court › M/S.charla International Ltd v. The Comm...

M/S.charla International Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-9

High Court 26 Mar 2003 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.charla International Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-9
Date of order
26 Mar 2003
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M/S.charla International Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-9, the High Court (2003) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4531 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4531 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4531 OF 2006 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.2641 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.2641 OF 2006 M/s.Charla International Ltd. .. Appellant V/s The Commissioner of Income Tax, City-9 .. Respondent Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Appellant. ORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN& CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 5th March, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay caused in filing the Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the Appeal on board for admission after two weeks. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan