Case LawHigh Court › M/S.deepak Fertilisers & Petrochemicals...

M/S.deepak Fertilisers & Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Iii

High Court 29 Jul 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.deepak Fertilisers & Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Iii
Date of order
29 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S.deepak Fertilisers & Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Iii, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 423 OF 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 424 AND 437 OF 2005. M/s.Deepak Fertilisers & Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd. ......AppellantV/sCommissioner of Income Tax, City-III. ......Respondent. Ms.Meetal Rana i/by B.V.Jhaveri, Adv. For the appellant.Mr.Vimal Gupta, Adv. For the respondent. CORAM:SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &A.P.DESHPANDE, J.DATED: 29[th] JULY 2008. PC: Learned counsel appearing for respective parties fairly state thatthe question of law in the present appeals has already been dealt ' withand answered by the Division Bench of this Court in Income TaxAppeal No.345 of 2005 decided on 23.6.08 in case of the presentassessee for the previous year. For the reasons recorded therein theseappeals have no merit and same are dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P.DESHPANDE, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan