In M/S.dhaulgiri Investment P Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ M/s.DHAULGIRI INVESTMENT P LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR RK PATEL for Petitioner No.
Decision: The Reference stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 304 of 1987
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Sd/-
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/-
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ M/s.DHAULGIRI INVESTMENT P LTD
Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR RK PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MR RP BHATT for Respondent No. 1
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 28/06/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE)
1.�Learned Advocate Mr. R.K.Patel has appeared for
the applicant-assessee, whereas learned Advocate Mr.Akil Qureshi has appeared for the Revenue.
2.�At the time of hearing of this Reference it was submitted by learned Advocate Shri R.K.Patel that he has been instructed by his client to withdraw this Reference. He, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the Reference. Permission granted. The Reference stands disposed of as withdrawn. In the circumstances, we decline to answer the question referred to us. No costs. ����Sd/-��Sd/- ���(A.R.Dave, J)�(D.A.Mehta,J)
m.m.bhatt
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.